Jeuveau for HCP

This page is meant for Healthcare Professionals

If you are a potential patient, please learn more about the product here.

Intentional Design

Jeuveau is a 900 kDa neurotoxin designed with purpose in California. Our unique manufacturing combines vacuum-dried processing with proprietary

Hi-Pure™ technology

resulting in ≥95% product purity and a
diffusion profile that supports results as you intend them.^2,9

Machines on the Jeuveau production line.

Unique manufacturing

900 KDA MOLECULE

Jeuveau utilizes the entire 900kDa complex. Accessory proteins are active and may contribute to the efficacy.⁸

HI-PURE TECHNOLOGY

Our HI-PURE™ Technology allows the purification of the toxin with at least 95% purity.¹

VACUUM VS.
FREEZE-DRIED

Vacuum-dried avoids crystal formation and minimizes product impurities, maintaining the integrity of the toxin.⁸

THE POWER OF PRECISION IS IN YOUR HANDS

Mechanism of Action

When used in conjunction with intramuscular injection for moderate to severe glabellar lines,^1,4 Jeuveau offers:

A precise, tight field of effect that puts control in your hands¹
Natural-looking results, exactly where you want them^4,9
Consistent outcomes, for consistently satisfied patients^4,9*

*87% of injectors consider Jeuveau to be a precise product when injected intramuscularly.⁸

Ready to try Jeuveau at your practice?

Create a Myevolus account

Results That Speak Volumes

Jeuveau demonstrated a proven safety profile in 5 clinical studies, all part of the Transparency Clinical Program:

2 phase III pivotal studies (n=645)⁴
The largest head-to-head aesthetic EU/Canada phase III trial vs BOTOX^® Cosmetic (n=540)^5,*
2 long-term safety studies (n=922)^6,7

In the 2 U.S. pivotal phase III studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients with moderate to severe frown lines had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement (none or mild frown lines) at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.

* Jeuveau demonstrated non-inferiority to BOTOX^® Cosmetic in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adults based on a GLS score of 0 or 1 at maximum front on Day 30 by investigator assessment.

FACE OFF AGAINST 
BOTOX^® COSMETIC

At Day 30

BOTOX^® Cosmetic

82.8%

of people studied
saw improvement
(n=244)

Two Jeuveau vials

At Day 30

Jeuveau

87.2%

of people studied
saw improvement
(n=235)

We’re so confident in our results, we put Jeuveau to the test against the legacy neurotoxin brand, BOTOX^® Cosmetic.⁵

Evolus conducted the largest head-to-head aesthetic phase III study and found that Jeuveau demonstrated non-inferiority to BOTOX^® Cosmetic in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adults based on a GLS score of 0 or 1 at maximum frown on Day 30 by investigator assessment.**

**A non-inferiority study is conducted to show that the effect of a treatment is not worse than the original treatment.

Primary Endpoint

GLS score of 0 or 1 at maximum frown on day 30 by investigator assessment.

Non-inferiority margin^5*: 10%

In that same study, 
Jeuveau was numerically favored
in 26/30 exploratory endpoints.^5*

^†️Investigator and subject assessment of GLS ≥1-point improvement at maximum frown at days 2, 14, 30, 90, 120, and 150.

PATIENT SATISFACTION

FAST ACTING LONG LASTING RESULTS

94.5% of Jeuveau patients report being satisfied with their results, enjoying smoother frown lines in as little as two days^* that last for up to four months.^5†

*About 50% of people begin showing improvement after two days (≥1-grade improvement by physician assessment). Most people (~69%) achieve complete results by day 30 (≥2-grade improvement by physician and patient assessments). †On average, Jeuveau patients receive 3 treatments a year.

Day 0 & Day 30

Day 2

Day 30

Day 120

Day 0 & Day 30

Day 2

Day 30

Day 120

Arielle

Arielle

Arielle

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Arielle

Arielle

Arielle

Arielle

Arielle

Arielle

David

David

David

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

David

David

David

David

David

David

Sarah

Sarah

Sarah

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Sarah

Sarah

Sarah

Sarah

Sarah

Sarah

Tajah

Tajah

Tajah

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Tajah

Tajah

Tajah

Tajah

Tajah

Tajah

Lisa

Lisa

Lisa

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Lisa

Lisa

Lisa

Lisa

Lisa

Lisa

Tia

Tia

Tia

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Tia

Tia

Tia

Tia

Tia

Tia

Shai

Shai

Shai

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Shai

Shai

Shai

Shai

Shai

Shai

Josephine

Josephine

Josephine

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Josephine

Josephine

Josephine

Josephine

Josephine

Josephine

Tugba

Tugba

Tugba

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Tugba

Tugba

Tugba

Tugba

Tugba

Tugba

Arielle

David

Sarah

Tajah

Lisa

Tia

Shai

Josephine

Tugba

See More Results

At maximum frown. Actual patient. Results may vary.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

Arielle

David

Sarah

Tajah

Lisa

Tia

Shai

Josephine

Tugba

See More Results

At maximum frown. Jeuveau^® patient. Individual results may vary.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician-and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 54% of Jeuveau patients had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician assessment compared to 12% for placebo (secondary endpoint).² In US studies, 46% and 56% had a ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 2 based on physician-assessment compared to 8% and 17% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be considered clinically meaningful.

In US studies, 68% and 70% of Jeuveau patients had a 2-grade or better physician- and patient-rated improvement in frown lines at Day 30, compared to 1% for placebo.³

In a study conducted in Europe and Canada, 58% of Jeuveau patients had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).² In US studies, 65% and 57% had ≥1-grade improvement in frown lines at Day 120 based on physician assessment, compared to 8% and 13% for placebo (exploratory endpoint).³ Results based on a 1-grade improvement may not be clinically meaningful.

Ready to join the Evolus Experience?

Start setting up your MyEvolus account and see all that Evolus can offer you today.

Create a Myevolus account

References

Jeuveau^® [package insert]. Evolus, Inc; 2023.
Kim CS, Song KY, Min KM, An YD, inventors; Daewoong Co, Ltd, assignee. Method for production of botulinum toxin. US patent 9,512,418 B2. December 6, 2016.
Kaminer MS, Cox SE, Fagien S, Kaufman J, Lupo M, Shamban A. Re-examining the optimal use of neuromodulators and the changing landscape: A consensus panel update. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(4 suppl 1):s5-15.
Beer KR, Shamban AT, Avelar RL, Gross JE, Jonker A. Efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar lines in adult subjects: results from 2 identical phase 3 studies. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(11):1381-1393.
Rzany BJ, Ascher B, Avelar RL, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3, non-inferiority study comparing prabotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(4):413-429.
Kaufman-Janette J, Avelar RL, Biesman BS, et al. The first of two one-year, multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, phase II safety studies of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients[published correction appears in Aesthet Sur J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):1494. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab229]. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(12):1409-1422.
Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, et al. The second of two one-year, multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, phase II safety studies of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult patients [published correction appears in Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):1494-1495. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab230]. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(12):1423-1438.
Avelar, Rui MD. Botulinum Toxin Accessory Proteins: Are They Just an Accessory?. Dermatologic Surgery 50(9S):p S38-S41, September 2024.
Data on file; REF-00258. Evolus, Inc., Newport Beach, CA.

Exclusively licensed and manufactured for: Evolus, Inc., 520 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1200, Newport Beach, CA 92660

*Your Club Evolus membership covers 20 units of Jeuveau per treatment, with a minimum of 90 days between each treatment. Units do not accrue if you wait more than 90 days between treatments. You will pay your provider directly for any additional treatments you receive. Cannot be combined with any other offer. Club Evolus members will be automatically opted out of Evolus Rewards™ upon enrollment. You can manage your Club Evolus account and payment method through your club.evolus.com login. If you cancel within the first three months a $100 cancellation fee will apply. Your Club Evolus membership is non-transferable and payments are non-refundable.

Spread of Toxin Effect
Postmarketing safety data from other approved botulinum toxins suggest that botulinum toxin effects may be observed beyond the site of local injection. The symptoms are consistent with the mechanism of action of botulinum toxin and may include asthenia, generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, ptosis, dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria, urinary incontinence, blurred vision and breathing difficulties. These symptoms have been reported hours to weeks after injection. Swallowing and breathing difficulties can be life threatening and there have been reports of death related to spread of toxin effects. In unapproved uses, including upper limb spasticity in children and approved indications, symptoms consistent with spread of toxin effect have been reported at doses comparable to or lower than the maximum recommended total dose. JEUVEAU is not approved for the treatment of spasticity or any conditions other than glabellar lines. Patients or caregivers should be advised to seek immediate medical care if swallowing, speech or respiratory difficulties occur.

Serious Adverse Reactions with Unapproved Use
‍Serious adverse reactions, including excessive weakness, dysphagia, and aspiration pneumonia, with some adverse reactions associated with fatal outcomes, have been reported in patients who received botulinum toxin injections for unapproved uses. In these cases, the adverse reactions were not necessarily related to distant spread of toxin, but may have resulted from the administration of botulinum toxin products to the site of injection and/or adjacent structures. In several of the cases, patients had pre-existing dysphagia or other significant disabilities. There is insufficient information to identify factors associated with an increased risk for adverse reactions associated with the unapproved uses of botulinum toxin products.

Increased Risk of Clinically Significant Effects with Pre-existing Neuromuscular Disorders
Individuals with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome) were excluded from the JEUVEAU clinical studies. Patients with neuromuscular disorders may be at increased risk of clinically significant effects, including generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, ptosis, dysphonia, dysarthria, severe dysphagia and respiratory compromise from typical doses of JEUVEAU.

Pre-existing Conditions at the Injection Site
Caution should be used when JEUVEAU is used in the presence of inflammation at the proposed injection site(s) or when excessive weakness or atrophy is present in the target muscle(s). Caution should be used when JEUVEAU treatment is used in patients who have marked facial asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin or when subjects do not respond to 20 Units of botulinum toxin (e.g. the inability to substantially lessen glabellar lines even by physically spreading them apart). Do not exceed the recommended dosage and frequency of administration of JEUVEAU.

JEUVEAU^® (prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs)